a fired college teacher has been portrayed in court as someone who resisted and resented a present day technique to running the college, and who campaigned in opposition to a colleague who beat him out for a activity merchandising there.
a attorney for the maritime university of wooded area era confronted rod cumberland with a detailed chronology of his common court cases about new strategies with the aid of new administrators in 2018 and 2019.
the college is denying cumberland’s declare he turned into fired for his views on the herbicide glyphosate and is arguing he was brushed off for being a tough and disruptive employee.
the teacher complained about yoga publications, “oversensitive” colleagues and the possible renaming of the college’s woodsmen lumberjack opposition crew with a gender-impartial term, in step with cumberland’s emails brought as proof in the court of king’s bench trial.
in a single e mail he mentioned “these liberal politically accurate leaders who’re changing the material of what our college has been.”
“you idea it have to be the vintage wooded area ranger faculty, and others thought something unique,” requested the college’s attorney clarence bennett.
later, bennett requested him, “you may trust me that none of this had to do with glyphosate spraying, proper?”
“proper,” cumberland answered.
cumberland, a wildlife biologist, is a vocal critic of industrial spraying of glyphosate by means of the forest industry and contends that it has contributed to a decline inside the province’s deer population.
at some stage in wednesday’s go-examination, bennett grilled him approximately how he contacted a attorney, coverage groups, and a fundy country wide park authentic trying to bolster his arguments in opposition to the relaxing of policies against pupil drinking.
the teacher says he was looking for readability because he turned into worried he might be personally liable if a scholar had been injured after consuming in the course of one of the college’s regular camp sports at fundy.
bennett informed cumberland it changed into “not your business” due to the fact govt director tim marshall and academic chair gareth davies had already made the selection.
“i assume it is a number of my enterprise if i’m going to be the person positioned out there,” cumberland said.
“all of a unexpected i am disrespectful and insubordinate for seeking to speak this.”
lost out on merchandising
the instructor become fired in june 2019. in 2017 he implemented for the job of instructional chair at the college but misplaced out to davies.
bennett counseled cumberland’s persistent complaints had been motivated by his bitterness over that decision but the former trainer says he became expressing legitimate concerns, consisting of about a heavy workload davies assigned him.
“as a believer i’m expected to turn the alternative cheek. … i couldn’t try this,” he stated.
“there is absolute confidence you were resisting mr. davies as your boss?” bennett asked.
“i had worries about the selections that he was making that have been going to have an effect on me.”
the trial also heard how cumberland complained about a mediator brought in to resolve a dispute among him and a colleague. the mediation efforts usually ended with the colleague and the mediator “pointing arms at me,” cumberland said.
bennett said he will be presenting proof that some of cumberland’s colleagues had warned him that he become liable to being fired if he failed to prevent complaining to davies and marshall.
the college’s lawyer also challenged cumberland’s declare about the effect of the firing on his potential to get a process, accusing him of searching out media insurance.
“the motive why your dismissal was so public is due to the fact you made it public,” bennett said.
it become cumberland’s choice to sue that forced the university to defend the decision with its account of his behaviour, he continued.
“you advised all and sundry who might pay attention which you’d get to the fact, and that is what we are doing, isn’t it?”
later wednesday, atlantic forestry centre director-wellknown peter fullarton confirmed in the course of his testimony that an e mail complaining approximately cumberland came from j.d. irving ltd.’s vice-president of woodlands jason limongelli.
limongelli wrote within the electronic mail that college teachers “must now not be undermining federal scientists.”
cbc information reported on the email in april however on the time limongelli’s name and name have been redacted. the unredacted model become entered into evidence on the trial.
in a later email marshall answered that it turned into “very critical to me that [the college] maintains a fine relationship with the companies running inside the zone we aim to serve.”
fullarton said he wasn’t aware about everyone from jdi searching for cumberland’s firing.
in the meantime, a federal research scientist with herbal resources canada testified that he wasn’t via cumberland’s comments at a seminar on glyphosate held at the college of latest brunswick in january 2019.
the university has noted his movements there “undermining” federal scientists as one of the grounds for his firing.
cumberland spoke at some stage in a query-and-solution period.
“the query he asked became extra of a declaration,” said chris area, one of the panelists. “it turned into quite aggressive, the manner he asked it. … it became more like an extended declaration.”
part said the subsequent week marshall invited him to a assembly in which he apologized for cumberland’s behaviour.
“i advised him that it did not bother me inside the least,” edge recounted.
fullarton stated all through his testimony however that he located cumberland competitive and didn’t think he became placing an amazing example for students in the manner he acted.
edge said he didn’t like cumberland’s insinuation in an email approximately the seminar that he wasn’t independent and changed into being manipulated by using the enterprise on the problem.
part stated he has published 14 peer-reviewed papers on glyphosate and introduced that even as he has no private view on the use of it, his scientific assessment is that it has “negligible” dangers when used in forests.